Here's a bit of dialogue among authors, all published. The other two won't let me identify them. I'm under dire peril if I reveal their names (this peril is also secret, but involves florescent lights and a bikini. Allow your worst imaginings run wild. Shudder.) but I can just say that the other two have made it onto best-selling lists.
Author A: Is anyone else a little concerned about the number of erotic lines coming out?
Author B: Yes, I am concerned. It's all soft porn, which will do nothing for Romance's credibility as a genre.
We're just starting to get some respect, starting to attract a broader
readership base thanks to some gifted writers, thanks to clever dialogue and intriguing premises, and now the industry chooses to revert back to bodice rippers?? Only this time featuring alpha females. Spare me!
Author Me: That's a good point, Author B. On the other hand, the more types of books that are labeled "Romance" the less the whole genre can be pinpointed. . . .if you see what I mean.
"MYSTERY" used to just mean hardboiled detectives. Now it can be anything from a hard boiled detective to a cat. Seems like the more the merrier so a member of the public doesn't just have one particular type of book in mind when the word is used.
That's the optimistic view, anyway. Or maybe the Would-be Erotica writer's view??
****
I have been bugging my local newspaper's book reporter, trying to get her to write about me, me, me. She's finally agreed to do an article, but it will be about erotica -- I think something about how it's mainstream? I will probably be a source of information, but not a subject. Hmmm, bad news, Authors A and B. Once our local paper (the Hartford Courant) agrees to cover something, it's a well-established cultural phenomenon. (Anything remotely cutting edge belongs to its sister paper, The Advocate.)
Another author friend has expressed concern that erotica emphasizes easy sex and has a real problem with the morality of that. I don't share that viewpoint -- I think people can't be corrupted by erotica unless they're in the mood for corruption -- and actually, even if I did believe it . . .well, I just read an erotic novel that has to be one of the nicest celebrations of long-term monogamy I've read in a long time, and that's including the sweet lines. Hmmm. I'm gonna look it up.
Right it's Memories to Come by Cricket Starr (okay, the names of erotic authors? Sort of silly. I think we can agree on that, says Summer Devin, or Devon) published by Ellora's Cave. Hot but sweet. It can be done!
I know RWA's sending out a questionaire about the definition of romance, and I'm betting it has to do with the whole erotica thing.
So, okay . .. . What do you guys think?